The only option I can think of is FA with all LB members active. It's still being looked into at Fortinet but I thought perhaps I'd check here as well to be sure.ĭoes anyone know whether what we want is possible? Or should we just run HAProxy instead? I tried contacting TAC support but not getting very far yet they're pointing me towards the "First Alive" loadbalancing method and told me that this does what I want, but upon further checking that is not the case as First Alive will failover from server A to server B, but will also redirect traffic back when server A becomes available again, which is not what we want. If possible we'd like to use the Fortigate for this since it is easier / less software to maintain, but I'm not sure if it is possible and how. We want the standby server to be used, until we manually change it back, or when it becomes unreachable. This works correctly, - however what we also want to do is that when the active server becomes reachable again, there is no automatic giveback. ![]() We would like to ensure, that when the active server becomes unreachable, traffic is instead directed to the standby server. We configure this in active/standby mode and it works well. So we just want redundancy, not load balancing. ![]() ![]() MySQL is configured as master-master, but we would like all queries to only go to a single real server. We use the Virtual Server feature on a Fortigate 100F on 6.4 to redirect MySQL traffic to a real server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |